"I want to touch people with my art. I want them to say, 'He feels deeply, he feels tenderly.'"The movie "Loving Vincent" is set to open in theatres shortly. This ground-breaking movie is entirely hand painted, and I am eager to see it. Not just for the way it was crafted, but for the story of Vincent. Much of what he wrote over his all too short of life really resonates with me, as I'm sure it does for many other artists.
Vincent van Gogh
While I am always striving to improve the technical mastery of my work, my main concern is expression, as I believe it was with van Gogh. I want my work to resonate with other people in the world who also feel deeply and tenderly. In that regard I have reached out to a couple of (so-called) experts over the past year to see how my work is perceived by others and if it is meeting the goals I have for it.
In one instance I was given the advice to continue to work on simplification to allow the emotion to be more easily expressed. To represent the figure with the slash of a well crafted brush stroke, rather than excessively rendering it. In another the person said: "Consider removing the figures from your work until you can render them so well that they have something strong to say and aren't props in a painting. "
The point is the figures are just props. As I've written before about staffage: figures placed to help guide the eye and tell the story, but not to form the story itself.
I was recently at the Monet exhibit at the Vancouver Art Gallery and while studying some of his work a discussion about the figures in his landscapes occurred. His painting 'Snow Effect Sunset' was one of my favourites from the exhibition. In it, his rendering of the figures are exactly what the first expert had been pushing me towards. Nothing more than a well placed slash of paint. What would happen to the painting if the figures were rendered more? Would the focus shift from the light and feeling of cold, to the figures alone? The hint of warmth in the sky would not have the same importance in telling us what a chilly day it is here if our attentions were diverted to more highly rendered figures.
How do the figures inform the composition of this painting?
Monet "Snow Effect Sunset" |
"Oh! I must somehow manage to do a figure in a few strokes."
Vincent van Gogh
van Gogh "Iron Mill In The Hague" |
Murray "The Peace That Nestles There" |
Therein lies the problem with art and, especially with seeking someone's advice, there is no one answer. Where one person comes from may be completely at odds with where another person is coming from. Where one artist is aiming for high realism, another's goal is personal expression. At it's simplest, it all boils down to "do you like the work....does it move you". The complexity resides in the why's and why nots.
So how do you know who you should seek counsel with, and who may be at complete opposition to your artistic intentions and style? The whole process has spurred me to want to write an article about what to look for before seeking someone for art advice, coaching, or critique, and I would like to ask my fellow artists if you have any stories about hiring someone you'd like to share. I am looking for good and bad situations. How have you benefitted by a critique? How has it hurt you? Do you have any tips for making sure you have hired someone that you will get along with and provide YOU with valuable but trustworthy opinions?
No comments:
Post a Comment